Skip to content

Expertise

Six practices, and what each one is engaged to deliver

Every practice below is led by a partner in daily client work. What follows is the question each is called in for, what you receive at the end, and how long it usually takes.

6
Practices
4–16 wks
Typical engagement
  1. Corporate Strategy

    Called in when a portfolio has drifted, a market has moved, or a board has funded a plan nobody believes. We rebuild the case from the demand side up, test it against the operation, and set out what to fund and what to close.

    Typical length
    10–14 weeks
    Practice lead
    Adaeze Okonjo

    What you receive

    • Portfolio review with a fund, hold or exit position on every business unit
    • Three-year plan with a bottom-up revenue model your finance team owns
    • Market entry case including the cost of the first two years of losses
  2. Operating Performance

    Cost-to-serve, throughput, yield and working capital. We size the opportunity in the first fortnight so the executive team can decide whether to continue, then build the plan with the line managers who will run it.

    Typical length
    12–16 weeks
    Practice lead
    Rafael Duarte

    What you receive

    • Opportunity map sized by site, line and customer segment
    • Ninety-day implementation plan with a named owner on every action
    • Weekly operating review pack the client keeps running after handover
  3. Transaction Advisory

    Commercial diligence for acquirers and their lenders, synergy cases that survive the first budget cycle, and the integration plan for the hundred days after close. We work alongside the deal team rather than behind it.

    Typical length
    4–9 weeks
    Practice lead
    Marta Lindqvist

    What you receive

    • Commercial diligence report with a stress-tested revenue bridge
    • Synergy case split into cost, revenue and one-off, each with an owner
    • Day-one and hundred-day integration plan with a decision calendar
  4. Technology & Data

    Platform and architecture decisions assessed on payback rather than on a vendor roadmap. We look at what the estate actually costs to run, what the migration will genuinely take, and what the automation case is worth after change management.

    Typical length
    8–12 weeks
    Practice lead
    Tobias Renner

    What you receive

    • Estate assessment with run cost by application and by business capability
    • Target architecture and a sequenced migration plan with cost per wave
    • Automation business case modelled net of change and retraining cost
  5. Organisation Design

    Spans, layers, accountability and the operating model that follows a merger, a spin-off or a new chief executive. We start from the decisions the organisation has to make, not from the boxes it currently has.

    Typical length
    8–12 weeks
    Practice lead
    Priyanka Menon

    What you receive

    • Decision map showing who decides, who is consulted and where it stalls
    • Target structure with spans, layers and a costed transition path
    • Role charters for the top three layers, written and agreed
  6. Risk & Regulation

    Regulatory change programmes for financial services and healthcare clients: gap assessment against the incoming rule, remediation plan, and the evidence pack that a supervisor will accept without a second request.

    Typical length
    10–20 weeks
    Practice lead
    Callum Reyes

    What you receive

    • Gap assessment mapped clause by clause to current controls
    • Remediation programme with a supervisory reporting calendar
    • Evidence pack and control testing protocol handed to internal audit

How an engagement runs

Four phases, and a decision point at the end of each

The same shape every time, so an executive team always knows what happens next, what it costs and what they are holding at the end of it.

  1. Week 1

    Frame

    A partner spends four days with the executive team and the data, and writes down the question the engagement will answer. If the question is already answered, we say so and stop here.

    You receive

    A one-page engagement charter, signed by both sides

  2. Weeks 2–4

    Size

    We quantify the opportunity from primary data before we design anything, so the executive team can decide whether the prize justifies the programme. Findings are shared as they emerge.

    You receive

    A sized opportunity map with the model attached

  3. Weeks 5–11

    Design

    The plan is built with the managers who will run it, in working sessions rather than in a room down the hall. Every action carries a named owner, a date and a number it is expected to move.

    You receive

    An implementation plan owned by line management

  4. Weeks 12–24

    Hand over

    We run the first two operating reviews with your team and then watch them run the next four. Ninety days of partner access is included, and no invoice follows it.

    You receive

    A running operating rhythm and ninety days of support

Selected engagements

What the work produced

Clients are described rather than named, because most of this work sits under a confidentiality agreement. Figures are taken from the client ledger at handover.

  • Industrial manufacturing14 weeks

    A family-held components group, four plants

    The situation

    Margin had fallen for six consecutive quarters while volume held. Nobody could say which products were losing money.

    18.4%
    Gross margin, up from 11.9%
    $31M
    Working capital released
  • Healthcare services16 weeks

    A regional network of 22 outpatient clinics

    The situation

    Two acquisitions had left three scheduling systems, four contracts with the same payer, and a nine-day booking lag.

    2.6 days
    Average booking lag, from 9.1
    $14.7M
    Annual run-rate saving
  • Financial services20 weeks

    A mid-market lender preparing for supervisory review

    The situation

    An incoming capital rule touched 61 controls, and the internal gap assessment had been open for eleven months.

    61 of 61
    Controls evidenced at first submission
    0
    Supervisory follow-up requests
  • Consumer goods9 weeks

    A branded food producer entering two new markets

    The situation

    The board had funded a launch plan built on distributor forecasts that had never been tested against shelf data.

    $46M
    Avoided spend on the weaker market
    11 months
    Time to positive contribution
Halvorsen Industrial GroupNorthbrook Health NetworkCastellan Capital PartnersMerrow & FieldsArcadia Energy SystemsDelaney Consumer BrandsWestmark LogisticsArdent Software

Next step

One conversation is usually enough to know

Forty-five minutes with a partner, no charge and no proposal attached. If we are not the right firm we will say so and suggest who is.